内容

目次

Vol.1: The Development of Independent State Constitutional Law I.Introduction to State Bills of Rights 1. U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights.2. Massachusetts Constitution, Part the First. 3. California Constitution,Article 1. 4. Texas Constitution, Article 1. 5. Report of the Committee onBill of Rights and Suffrage, New York Constitutional Convention (1967). 6.Bill of Rights Committee Proposal No. VIII, Montana Constitutional Convention(1971-72). II. The Jurisprudential Basis for an Independent StateConstitutional Law 1. Barron vs. Baltimore (1833). 2. Paul Finkelman: StateConstitutional Protection of Liberty and the Antebellum New Jersey SupremeCourt: Chief Justice Hornblower and the Fugitive Slave Law, Rutgers LawJournal (1992). 3. Duncan vs. Louisiana (1968). 4. Michigan vs. Long (1983).III. The Call to Heightened State Protection of Individual Liberties 1.William J. Brennan, Jr: State Constitutions and the Protection of IndividualRights, Harvard Law Review (1977). IV. The Response from State Courts andJudges 1. Hans A. Linde: First Things First: Rediscovering the States' Billof Rights, University of Baltimore Law Review (1980). 2. State vs. Henry (Or.1987). 3. Stewart G. Pollock: State Constitutions as Separate Sources ofFundamental Rights, Rutgers Law Review (1983). 4. State vs. Jackson (Wash.1984). 5. Shirley S. Abrahamson: Criminal Law and State Constitutions: TheEmergence of State Constitutional Law, Texas Law Review (1985). 6. Judith S.Kaye: Dual Constitutionalism in Practice and Principle, St. John's Law Review(1987). 7. Immuno A.G. vs. Moor-Jankowski (N.Y. 1991). 8. Commonwealth vs.Wasson (Ky. 1993). V. Contemporary State Constitutional Litigation 1. Briefof Governor Lincoln C. Almond, Relating to his Request for an AdvisoryOpinion to the Justices (1997). Vol.2: The Jurisprudential Crisis of StateConstitutional Law I. The Backlash Against New Judicial Federalism 1.State vs. Florance (Or. 1974). 2. California Proposition 8, Victim's Bill ofRights (1982). 3. Florida Constitution: Article I, Section 12. 4. State vs.Barton (Conn. 1991). II. The Debate Over Interpretive Methodology 1. HansA. Linde: E Pluribus: Constitutional theory and State, Georgia Law Review(1984). 2. State vs. Hunt (N.J. 1982). 3. State vs. Gunwall (Wash. 1986). 4.Robert F. Utter: Swimming in the Jaws of the Crocodile: State Court Commenton Federal Constitutional Issues when Disposing of Cases on StateConstitutional Grounds, Texas Law Review (1985). III. The Scholarly Critique1. George Deukmejian and C.K. Thompson Jr: All Sail and No Anchor: JudicialReview under the California Constitution, Hastings Constitutional LawQuarterly (1979). 2. Earl M. Maltz: False Prophet: Justice Brennan and theTheory of State Constitutional Law, Hasti