商品詳細 | Knowledge Worker

【法的推論の手法】

Methods of Legal Reasoning 2006th ed.(Law and Philosophy Library Vol.78) P x, 220 p. 06

在庫状況海外在庫有り	お届け予定日 1ヶ月	数量冊
価格 \24,403（税込）

この商品について問合せる

発行年月	2006年09月
出版社／提供元	Springer Netherlands
出版国	オランダ
言語	英語
媒体	冊子
装丁	paper
ページ数／巻数	IX, 233 p.
ジャンル	洋書／社会科学／法学／基礎法・法哲学・法社会学
ISBN	9781402049361
商品コード	0200620269
本の性格	学術書
新刊案内掲載月	2006年07月
商品URL	https://kw.maruzen.co.jp/ims/itemDetail.html?itmCd=0200620269

内容

Anyone reflecting on the methodology of legal reasoning faces a difficult task. The number of methodological theories in jurisprudence and the vast literature on the subject are not the only problems that have to be taken into account. Perhaps the most striking difficulty concerning the methodology of legal argument is the heated debate between jurists, legal theorists and philosophers of law that has been recurring since at least nineteenth century. Therefore a justification is needed for writing yet another book c- cerning the methods of legal reasoning; a book that aims to cover a lot of what has already been proposed in legal theory. We believe that there is such a justification. First, the perspective that we adopt in the present book is unique, at least in some respects. We venture to look at the methodology of legal reasoning “from the outside”, i.e. from a more g- eral, philosophical perspective, while taking into account the “hard re- ity” of law. This perspective enables us to ask questions about the justification for the methods of legal argument presented. Second, we do not want to defend one, paradigmatic conception of legal reasoning. On the contrary, we put forward the thesis that there is a plurality of argumentative methods. The plurality, however, does not lead to relativism in legal decision-making. Third, we reject any hierarchy of the methods of legal reasoning, and take the view that one can speak only of the precision and flexibility of different methodologies.

PART I. Controversy over legal methodology in the 19th and 20th centuries. 1. Three stances. 1.1. The rejection of method. 1.2. Methodological heteronomy. 1.3. Methodological autonomy. 2. Methods of legal reasoning. 3. Logic – analysis – argumentation – hermeneutics. PART II. Logic. 1. Introduction. 2. Classical logic: propositional logic and first order predicate logic. 2.1. Presentation of calculi. 2.2. Paradoxes of material implication. 2.3. Examples. 3. Deontic logic. 3.1. Possible world semantics. 3.2. Deontic logic. 3.3. Paradoxes of deontic logic. 3.4. Examples. 4. Logic of action and logic of norms. 4.1. Two types of obligation. 4.2. Logic of action. 4.3. Jørgensen Dilemma. 5. Defeasible logic. 5.1. The concept of defeasibility. 5.2. Defeasible logic. 5.3. Objections against nonmonotonic logic. 5.4. Examples. 5.5. Two remarks. 6. Summary. PART III. Analysis. 1. Introduction. 1.1. The notion of analysis. 1.2. History of the concept. 1.3. Analytic philosophy. 2. Linguistic analysis. 2.1. History and basic assumptions of linguistic analysis. 2.2. Legal conceptual scheme. 2.3. Speech acts theory. 2.4. The method and its limits. 3. Economic analysis of law. 3.1. Law & Economics. 3.2. Idea of economisation. 3.3. Limits of the method. 3.4. Conclusions. 4. Summary. PART IV. Argumentation. 1. Introduction. 1.1. Philosophies of argumentation. 1.2. Criteria of a practical discourse. 2. Two conceptions of a legal discourse. 2.1. The topical-rhetorical conception of legal discourse. 2.2. Procedural conception of legal discourse. 3. Legal argumentation. 3.1. Claim to universality. 3.2. Structure of legal discourse. 3.3. Applications.PART V. Hermeneutics.1. Introduction. 1.1. The beginnings of hermeneutics. 1.2. What do we not know about hermeneutics? 2. Hermeneutics as epistemology. 2.1. Methodological current in philosophical hermeneutics. 2.2. Legal receptions. 3. Hermeneutics as ontology. 3.1. Ontology of understanding. 3.2. Legal receptions. 4. The understanding of the law. 4.1. Claim to universality. 4.2. The nature of hermeneutic cognition. 4.3. Applications. PART VI. Methods of legal reasoning from a post-modern perspective. 1. A summary. 1.1. Arbitrariness. 1.2. Metatheoretical perspective. 1.3. Relationships between the methods: the three theses. 2. Dilemmas of the contemporary philosophy of law. 2.1. Contemporary positivism. 2.2. Conclusions. 3. The epistemological approach. 3.1. The limits of legal cognition. 3.2. Two discourses. 4. Unfinished projects. 4.1. Classicism. 4.2. Modernism. 4.3. Postmodernism.

カート

カートに商品は入っていません。

前のページに戻る