目次

1 Uniformity in International Trade 2 Uniformity in the UNCITRAL Model Law 3 Textual Uniformity of the UNCITRAL Model Law 4 Applied Uniformity of the UNCITRAL Model Law – Juristic Methodology 5 Applied Uniformity of the UNCITRAL Model Law – Testing Uniformity of Article 34 6 Conclusion Table 1 Comparison between Text of UML Article 34 and Its Equivalents in the NYC (Article V), UML Article 36 and Each of the Three Jurisdictions Treatment of Article 34 and Their NYC Equivalents Table 2 Summary of Case Analysis (I-Norm and Textual Uniformity – All Cases) Table 3 Summary of Case Analysis (I-Norm and Textual Uniformity): Enforcement and Setting Aside Table 4 Summary of Case Analysis (I-Norm and Textual Uniformity): Enforcement Table 5 Summary of Case Analysis (I-Norm and Textual Uniformity): Setting Aside Table 6 Aside Case Analysis (I-Norm and Textual Uniformity) Table 7 Summary of Case Analysis: Enforcement and Setting Aside (Grounds Analysis – All Jurisdictions) Table 8 Summary of Case Analysis-Hong Kong: Enforcement and Setting Aside (Grounds Analysis) Table 9 Summary of Case Analysis-Singapore: Enforcement and Setting Aside (Grounds Analysis) Table 10 Summary of Case Analysis-Australia: Enforcement and Setting Aside (Grounds Analysis) Table 11 Citation of I-Ratios Table 12 List of I-Ratios