丸善のおすすめ度
【ペーターゼン:比例性と司法積極主義】
Proportionality and Judicial Activism: Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa H 258 p. 17
Petersen, Niels
著
発行年月 |
2017年03月 |
---|
|
出版国 |
アメリカ合衆国 |
---|
言語 |
英語 |
---|
媒体 |
冊子 |
---|
装丁 |
hardcover |
---|
|
ページ数/巻数 |
258 p. |
---|
|
|
ジャンル |
洋書/社会科学/法学/法学:概論 |
---|
|
|
ISBN |
9781107177987 |
---|
|
商品コード |
1022888968 |
---|
|
|
国件名 |
カナダ/
ドイツ/
南アフリカ
|
本の性格 |
学術書 |
---|
|
新刊案内掲載月 |
2017年03月 |
---|
|
商品URL
| https://kw.maruzen.co.jp/ims/itemDetail.html?itmCd=1022888968 |
---|
内容
The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism.