目次

Introduction i. The challenge ii. The structure iii. The approach iv. The contribution and the argument Chapter 1: Developing the concept of ‘justice as discourse’ 1.1 The challenge of diversity: liberal theory’s normative commitment 1.2 Alternatives to Rawls’ theory 1.3 Constructing a theory: justice as discourse 1.4 Justice as discourse versus some alternatives 1.5 Conclusion Chapter 2: Justice as discourse in application 2.1 Justice as discourse and classical liberal theory 2.2 Justice as discourse and the Secular 2.3 Implementing justice as discourse: the axes of state, law, civil society and politics 2.4 Conclusion Chapter 3: Muslim Contexts I: History and heritage 3.1 Why use the term ‘Muslim contexts’? 3.2 What is the same, and what is different, about Muslim contexts? 3.3 The politico-legal legacy 3.4 Conclusion and lessons from the heritage Chapter 4: Muslim Contexts II: Contemporary contexts 4.1 Re- working the law: replacement, codifications and ‘etatization’ 4.2 The nexus of Din, Dunya and Dawla: religion, politics and the state – divided? 4.3 Contemporary opinions in Muslim populations 4.4 Prospects for democracy? 4.5  Conclusion Chapter 5: Terms of engagement: (re)imagining religion, law, state and society for Muslim contexts 5.1 Challenges to the uses of liberal theory 5.2 Defining a practical political model 5.3 The bridge from politics to law: Menski’s kite 5.4 The overall argument and conclusion Conclusion