内容

目次

Contents: Volume I Introduction Oren Bracha PART I. EARLY ORIGINS 1. Pamela O. Long (1991), `Invention, Authorship, "Intellectual Property," and the Origin of Patents: Notes toward a Conceptual History', Technology and Culture, 32 (4), October, 846-84 2. Joanna Kostylo (2010), `From Gunpowder to Print: The Common Origins of Copyright and Patent', in Ronan Deazley, Martin Kretschmer and Lionel Bently (eds), Privilege and Property: Essays on the History of Copyright, Chapter 1, Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 21-50 3. Carlo Marco Belfanti (2004), `Guilds, Patents, and the Circulation of Technical Knowledge: Northern Italy During the Early Modern Age', Technology and Culture, 45 (3), July, 569-89 4. Liliane Hilaire-Perez (1991), `Invention and the State in 18th-Century France', Technology and Culture, 32 (4), October, 911-31 5. Martha Woodmansee (1984) `The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the "Author"', Eighteenth Century Studies, 17 (4), Summer, 425-48 PART II. BRITISH PATENTS 6. Chris R. Kyle (1988), 'But a New Button to an Old Coat: The Enactment of the Statute of Monopolies, 21 James I cap.3', Journal of Legal History, 19 (3), December, 203-23 7. Adam Mossoff (2001), `Rethinking the Development of Patents: An Intellectual History, 1550-1800', Hastings Law Journal, 52 (6), August, 1255-322 8. John N. Adams and Gwen Averley (1986), `The Patent Specification: The Role of Liardet v. Johnson', Journal of Legal History, 7 (2), September, 156-77 9. Eric Robinson (1972), `James Watt and the Law of Patents', Technology and Culture, 13 (2), April, 115-39 10. Christine MacLeod (1999), `Negotiating the Rewards of Invention: The Shop-Floor Inventor in Victorian Britain', Business History, 41 (2), April, 17-36 PART III. BRITISH COPYRIGHT 11. Ian Gadd (2016), `The Stationer's Company in England before 1710', in Isabella Alexander and H. Tomas Gomez-Arostegui (eds), Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Chapter 5, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 81-95 12. Ronan Deazley (2010), `The Statute of Anne and the Great Abridgement Swindle', Houston Law Review, 47 (4), December, 793-818 13. Mark Rose (1988), `The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship', Representations, 23, Summer, 51-85 14. H. Tomas Gomez-Arostegui (2014), `Copyright at Common Law in 1774 -', Connecticut Law Review, 47 (1), November, 1-57 15. Will Slauter (2013) `Upright Piracy: Understanding the Lack of Copyright for Journalism in Eighteenth-Century Britain', Book History, 16 (1), 34-61 16. Isabella Alexander (2007), 'Criminalising Copyright: A Story of Publishers, Pirates and Pieces of Eight', Cambridge Law Journal, 66 (3), November, 625-56 17. Jose Bellido and Kathy Bowrey (2014), `From the Author to the Proprietor: Newspaper Copyright and The Times (1842-1956)', Journal of Media Law, 6 (2), 206-33 PART IV. THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL CLAUSE 18. Tyler T. Ochoa and Mark Rose (2002), `The Anti-Monopoly Origins of the Patent and Copyright Clause', Journal, Copyright Society of the U.S.A., 49 (3), 675-706 19. L. Ray Patterson and Craig Joyce (2003), 'Copyright in 1791: An Essay Concerning the Founders' View of the Copyright Power Granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution', Emory Law Journal, 52, 909-52 PART V. AMERICAN PATENTS 20. Mario Biagioli (2006), `Patent Republic: Representing Inventions, Constructing Rights and Authors', Social Research, 73 (4), Winter, 1129-72 21. Steven Lubar (1991), `The Transformation of Antebellum Patent Law', Technology and Culture', 32 (4), October, 932-59 22. Kara W. Swanson (2009), `The Emergence of the Professional Patent Practitioner', Technology and Culture, 50 (3), July, 519-48 23. Adam Mossoff (2011), `The Rise and Fall of the First American Patent Thicket: The Sewing Machine War of the 1850s', Arizona Law Review, 53 (1), 165-21 24. Alain Pottage and Brad Sherman (2007), 'Organisms and Manufactures: On the History of Plant Inventions', Melbourne University Law Review, 31 (2), 539-68 25. Steven W. Usselman and Richard R. John (2006), `Patent Politics: Intellectual Property, the Railroad Industry, and the Problem of Monopoly', Journal of Policy History, 18 (1), 96-125 26. Catherine L. Fisk (1998), `"Removing the Fuel" of Interest from the `Fire of Genius': Law and the Employee Inventor, 1830-1930', University of Chicago Law Review, 65 (4), Autumn, 1127-99 27. Kara W. Swanson (2011), `Getting a Grip on the Corset: Gender, Sexuality, and Patent Law', Yale Journal of Law and Feminism', 23 (1), 57-115 28. Christopher Beauchamp (2016), `The First Patent Litigation Explosion', Yale Law Journal, 125 (4), February, 848-944 Volume II An introduction to both volumes by the editor appears in volume 1 PART I. AMERICAN COPYRIGHT 1. Jane C. Ginsburg (1990), `A Tale of Two Copyrights: Literary Property in Revolutionary France and America', Tulane Law Review, 64 (5), May, 991-1031 2. Meredith L. McGill (1997), `The Matter of the Text: Commerce, Print Culture, and the Authority of the State in American Copyright Law', American Literary History, 9 (1), Spring, 21-59 3. Oren Bracha (2008), `The Ideology of Authorship Revisited: Authors, Markets, and Liberal Values in Early American Copyright', Yale Law Journal, 118 (2), November, 186-271 4. Robert Brauneis (2009), `The Transformation of Originality in the Progressive-Era Debate over Copyright in News', Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 27 (2), 321-73 5. Zvi S. Rosen (2007), `The Twilight of the Opera Pirates: A Prehistory of the Exclusive Right of Public Performance for Musical Compositions', Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 24, 1157-1218 PART II TRADEMARKS 6. Paul Duguid (2009), `French Connections: The International Propagation of Trademarks in the Nineteenth Century', Enterprise and Society, 10 (1), March 3-37 7. Lionel Bently (2007), `The Making of Modern Trade Mark Law: The Construction of the Legal Concept of Trade Mark 1860-80', in Lionel Bently, Jennifer Davis and Jane C. Ginsburg (eds), Trade Marks and Brands: An Interdisciplinary Critique, Chapter 1, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 3-41 8. Robert G. Bone (2006), `Hunting Goodwill: A History of the Concept of Goodwill in Trademark Law', Boston University Law Review, 86 (3), June, 547-622 9. Steven Wilf (2008), `The Making of the Post-War Paradigm in American Intellectual Property Law', Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, 31 (2), 139-207 PART III COLONIAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 10. Lionel Bently (2007), `Copyright, Translations, and Relations Between Britain and India in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries', Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82 (3), 1181-240 11. Michael D. Birnhack (2011), `Hebrew Authors and English Copyright Law in Mandate Palestine', Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 12 (1), January, 201-40 PART IV INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 12. Lionel Bently and Brad Sherman (2001), `Great Britain and the Signing of the Berne Convention in 1886: Part 2', Journal, Copyright Society of the U.S.A., 48 (3), Spring, 311-40 13. Catherine Seville (2008), `Authors as Copyright Campaigners: Mark Twain's Legacy', Journal, Copyright Society of the U.S.A., 55 (2/3), Winter/Spring, 283-359 PART V ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES 14. B. Zorina Khan (1995), `Property Rights and Patent Litigation in Early Nineteenth-Century America', Journal of Economic History, 55 (1), March, 58-97 15. Petra Moser (2005), `How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs', American Economic Review, 95 (4), September, 1214-36 16. Naomi R. Lamoreaux, Kenneth L. Sokoloff, and Dhanoos Sutthiphisal, (2013), `Patent Alchemy: The Market for Technology in U.S. History', Business History Review, 87 (1), Spring, 3-38 Index