内容

目次

Contents: Acknowledgements Introduction Mark Tushnet PART I HISTORY OF THE FIELD 1. Armin von Bogdandy (2009), `The Past and Promise of Doctrinal Constructivism: A Strategy for Responding to the Challenges Facing Constitutional Scholarship in Europe', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (3), July, 364-400 2. Ran Hirschl (2013), `Editorial: From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (1), January, 1-11 3. David Fontana (2011), `The Rise and Fall of Comparative Constitutional Law in the Postwar Era', Yale Journal of International Law, 36 (1), Winter, 1-53 PART II METHODOLOGY 4. Oliver Brand (2007), `Conceptual Comparisons: Towards a Coherent Methodology of Comparative Legal Studies', Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 32 (2), 405-66 5. Gunter Frankenberg (2006), `Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals, and Ideology - Toward a Layered Narrative', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4 (3), July, 439-59 6. Pierre Legrand (1996), `How to Compare Now', Legal Studies, 16 (2), July, 232-42 7. Ran Hirschl (2005), `The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law', American Journal of Comparative Law, 53 (1), Winter, 125-55 PART III CONSTITUTION MAKING 8. Jon Elster (1995), `Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process', Duke Law Journal, 45 (2), November, 364-96 9. Nathan J. Brown (2008), `Reason, Interest, Rationality, and Passion in Constitution Drafting', Perspectives on Politics, 6 (4), December, 675-89 PART IV USES OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 10. Vicki C. Jackson (2005), `Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement', Harvard Law Review, 119 (1), November, 109-28 11. Eric A. Posner and Cass R. Sunstein (2006), `The Law of Other States', Stanford Law Review, 59 (1), October, 131-79 12. Eyal Benvenisti (2008), `Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts', American Journal of International Law, 102 (2), April, 241-74 13. Mark C. Rahdert (2007), `Comparative Constitutional Advocacy', American University Law Review, 56 (3), 553-665 PART V NONLIBERAL CONSTITUTIONALISM 14. Mark Tushnet (2015), `Authoritarian Constitutionalism', Cornell Law Review, 100 (2), 391-461 15. David Landau (2013), `Abusive Constitutionalism', University of California Davis Law Review, 47 (1), November, 189-260 16. David S. Law and Mila Versteeg (2013), `Sham Constitutions', California Law Review, 101 (4), August, 863-952 Volume II Contents: Acknowledgements Introduction An introduction by the editor appears in Volume I PART I STRUCTURES OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW: CENTRALIZED VERSUS DECENTRALIZED 1. Victor Ferreres Comella (2004), `The Consequences of Centralizing Constitutional Review in a Special Court: Some Thoughts on Judicial Activism', Texas Law Review, 82 (7), June, 1705-36 2. Alec Stone Sweet (2003), `Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review and Why it May Not Matter', Michigan Law Review, 101, August, 2744-80 3. John Ferejohn and Pasquale Pasquino (2004), `Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe', Texas Law Review, 82 (7), June, 1671-1704 PART II STRONG VERSUS WEAK FORM REVIEW 4. Mark Tushnet (2003), `Alternative Forms of Judicial Review', Michigan Law Review, 101 (8), August, 2781-2802 5. Stephen Gardbaum (2010), `Reassessing the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8 (2), April, 167-206 6. Rosalind Dixon (2007), `Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5 (3), July, 391-418 7. Rivka Weill (2012), `Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Review: On the Theoretical and Historical Origins of the Israeli Legislative Override Power', Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 39 (2), Winter, 457-511 PART III JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS, TENURE, AND INDEPENDENCE 8. Lee Epstein, Jack Knight and Olga Shvetsova (2001), `Comparing Judicial Selection Systems', William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 10 (1), 7-36 9. Mary L. Clark (2011), `Advice and Consent vs. Silence and Dissent? The Contrasting Roles of the Legislature in U.S. and U.K. Judicial Appointments', Louisiana Law Review, 71 (2), Winter, 451-502 10. Tom Ginsburg (2002), `Economic Analysis and the Design of Constitutional Courts', Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 3 (1), May, 49-85 PART IV METHODOLOGY OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW: PROPORTIONALITY AND CATEGORICAL ANALYSIS 11. Dieter Grimm (2007), `Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence', University of Toronto Law Journal, 57 (2), Spring, 383-397 12. Jacco Bomhoff (2008), `Balancing, the Global and the Local: Judicial Balancing as a Problematic Topic in Comparative (Constitutional) Law', Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 31 (2), Summer, 555-86 13. Moshe Cohen-Eliya and Iddo Porat (2011), `Proportionality and the Culture of Justification', American Journal of Comparative Law, 59 (2), Spring, 463-90 PART V EMERGENCY POWERS 14. John Ferejohn and Pasquale Pasquino (2004), `The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2 (2), April, 210-39 15. Gabriel L. Negretto and Jose Antonio Aguilar Rivera (2000), `Liberalism and Emergency Powers in Latin America: Reflections on Carl Schmitt and the Theory of Constitutional Dictatorship', Cardozo Law Review, 21 (5-6), May, 1797-1823 16. Jenny S. Martinez (2006), `Inherent Executive Power: A Comparative Perspective', Yale Law Journal, 115 (9), September, 2480-2511 17. Kim Lane Scheppele (2006), `North American Emergencies: The Use of Emergency Powers in Canada and the United States', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4 (2), April, 213-43 PART VI HUMAN DIGNITY: PRIVACY, AUTONOMY AND RELATED CATEGORIES 18. Christopher McCrudden (2008), `Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights', European Journal of International Law, 19 (4), September, 655-724 19. Ran Hirschl (1998), `Israel's "Constitutional Revolution": The Legal Interpretation of Entrenched Civil Liberties in an Emerging Neo-Liberal Economic Order', American Journal of Comparative Law, 46 (3), Summer, 427-52 20. James Q. Whitman (2004), `The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty', Yale Law Journal, 113 (6), April, 1151-1221 21. Doron Shultziner and Guy E. Carmi (2014), `Human Dignity in National Constitutions: Functions, Promises and Dangers', American Journal of Comparative Law, 62 (2), Spring, 461-90 PART VII SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS 22. Katharine G. Young (2008), `The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content', Yale Journal of International Law, 33 (1), 113-75 23. Brian Ray (2009), `Policentrism, Political Mobilization, and the Promise of Socioeconomic Rights', Stanford Journal of International Law, 45 (1), Winter, 151-201 24. Courtney Jung, Ran Hirschl and Evan Rosevear (2014), `Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions', American Journal of Comparative Law, 62 (4), December, 1043-93 Volume III Contents: Acknowledgements Introduction An introduction by the editor appears in Volume I PART I FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: POLITICAL ADVOCACY 1. Mehrdad Payandeh (2010), `The Limits of Freedom of Expression in the Wunsiedel Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court', German Law Journal, 11 (8), 929-42 2. Jaclyn Ling-Chien Neo (2011), `Seditious in Singapore! Free Speech and the Offence of Promoting Ill-Will and Hostility between Different Racial Groups', Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, December, 351-72 3. Patrick Macklem (2006), `Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-Determination', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4 (3), July, 488-516 PART II FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: DEFAMATION 4. Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr. (2005), `Defamation in the Digital Age: Some Comparative Law Observations on the Difficulty of Reconciling Free Speech and Reputation in the Emerging Global Village', Washington and Lee Law Review, 62 (1), 339-53 PART III FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: ELECTION LAW 5. Yasmin Dawood (2006), `Democracy, Power, and the Supreme Court: Campaign Finance Reform in Comparative Context', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4 (2), April, 269-93 PART IV FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: HATE SPEECH AND RELATED TOPICS 6. Ian Cram (2012), `Coercing Communities or Promoting Civilised Discourse? Funeral Protests and Comparative Hate Speech Jurisprudence', Human Rights Law Review, 12 (3), September, 455-78 7. David Kretzmer (1987), `Freedom of Speech and Racism', Cardozo Law Review, 8, 445-513 8. Michel Rosenfeld (2003), `Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis', Cardozo Law Review, 24 (4), April, 1523-67 PART V RIGHTS OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT AND FREE EXERCISE 9. Nimer Sultany (2014), `Religion and Constitutionalism: Lessons from American and Islamic Constitutionalism', Emory International Law Review, 28 (1), 345-424 10. Ran Hirschl and Ayelet Shachar (2009), `The New Wall of Separation: Permitting Diversity, Restricting Competition', Cardozo Law Review, 30 (6), June, 2535-60 11. Jill I. Goldenziel (2013), `Veiled Political Questions: Islamic Dress, Constitutionalism, and the Ascendance of Courts', American Journal of Comparative Law, 61 (1), Winter, 1-50 PART VI EQUALITY: SUBSTANTIVE AND FORMAL 12. Paolo Wright-Carozza (1993), `Organic Goods: Legal Understandings of Work, Parenthood, and Gender Equality in Comparative Perspective', California Law Review, 81 (2), March, 531-92 13. Anja Seibert-Fohr (2010), `The Rise of Equality in International Law and its Pitfalls: Learning from Comparative Constitutional Law', Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 35 (1), 1-39 14. Carolyn A. Dubay (2012), `Beyond Critical Mass: A Comparative Perspective on Judicial Design and Gender Equality in Iraq and Afghanistan', Florida Journal of International Law, 24 (1), April, 163-211 PART VII EQUALITY: POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 15. Julie Chi-Hye Suk (2007), `Equal By Comparison: Unsettling Assumptions of Antidiscrimination Law', American Journal of Comparative Law, 55 (2), Spring, 295-345 16. Blanca Rodriguez-Ruiz and Ruth Rubio-Marin (2008), `The Gender of Representation: On Democracy, Equality, and Parity ', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (2), April, 287-316 17. Sean A. Pager (2007), `Antisubordination of Whom? What India's Answer Tells Us About the Meaning of Equality in Affirmative Action', University of California Davis Law Review, 41 (1), November, 289-356 18. Robert J. Cottrol (2004), `Brown and the Contemporary Brazilian Struggle against Racial Inequality: Some Preliminary Comparative Thoughts', University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 66 (1), 113-29 PART VIII ABORTION AND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM 19. Mary Ann Glendon (1989), `Legal Institutions: A Beau Mentir Qui Vient De Loin: The 1988 Canadian Abortion Decision in Comparative Perspective', Northwestern University Law Review, 83 (3), Spring, 569-91 20. Reva B. Siegel (2012), `Dignity and Sexuality: Claims on Dignity in Transnational Debates over Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10 (2), March, 355-79 21. Gerald L. Neuman (1995), `Casey in the Mirror: Abortion, Abuse and the Right to Protection in the United States and Germany', American Journal of Comparative Law, 43 (2), Spring, 273-314 Index