Loscerbo, John 　著

内容

目次

One: Preparation for the Question Concerning Modern Technology.- I. Beginnings: $$ T\varepsilon '\chi \nu \eta $$ and the Origin of Modern Technology.- A. The Primordial Notion of $$ \Phi \upsilon '\sigma \iota \zeta $$.- B. $$ \Phi \upsilon '\sigma \iota \zeta$$ and $$ \Lambda o'\gamma o\zeta $$ (Heraclitus and Parmenides).- 1. Heraclitus and the $$ \Lambda o'\gamma o\zeta $$.- 2. Parmenides.- C. The Notion of $$ T\varepsilon '\chi \nu \eta$$ (Sophocles’ Chorus).- 1. Stage One.- 2. Stage Two.- 3. Stage Three.- D. The Notion of $$ T\varepsilon '\chi \nu \eta$$ as Responsive “Wissen”.- II. The Platonic $$ ^,I\delta \varepsilon '\alpha$$ and $$ ^,I\delta \varepsilon '\nu$$.- A. The Platonic $$ ^,I\delta \varepsilon '\alpha$$ “Affinity” and “Distance”.- B. A More Appropriate Interpretation of the Relationship $$ ^,I\delta \varepsilon '\alpha { - ^{{\text{ }},}}I\delta \varepsilon '\iota \nu $$.- C. The “Primacy of Beings” (“Vorrang des Seienden”).- III. Descartes: The “Beginning” of Modern Technology.- A. The Notion of “Reality”.- B. The Second Determination of the Notion of Reality.- C. The Cartesian Task.- 1. Preliminary.- 2. The Execution of the Task.- IV. Nietzsche and the “Consummation” of Metaphysics.- A. First Approximation to the Notion of the Will to Power.- B. The Will to Power as the Most Radical Subjectivity.- C. The Will to Power and the Eternal Return of the Same.- D. The “Consummation” and the “End” of Metaphysics.- Two: First Approach toward the Question of the Essence of Modern Technology.- I. Remarks concerning Some Earlier Texts.- A. A Text from Nietzsche II (pp. 20–29).- B. “Seinsverlassenheit und Irrnis”.- II. Texts from “Wozu Dichter”.- A. The Will (der Wille) and Human Willing (Wollen).- B. Human Willing.- C. The “Danger” and the “Turn”.- III. The Essay “Die Frage nach der Technik”.- A. “Technology Is Not Identical with the Essence of Technology”.- B. The “Correct” Notion of Technology and the Analysis of Causality ($$T\varepsilon '\chi \eta $$).- C. Modern Technology as a Manner of “Revealing”.- D. The Notion of “Unconcealment”, Especially the Thesis that the Unconcealment of Beings Implies the Concealment of Being.- E. The Notion of Ge-stell.- Three: Second Approach toward the Question of the Essence of Modern Technology.- I. The Notion of Geschick.- A. The Truth-Untruth Structure.- 1. Sein und Zeit: Dasein’s Openness.- a. Attunement.- b. Primary Understanding.- c. Rede.- d. Fallenness.- e. Being-toward-Death and Resolute Openness (Entschlossenheit).- 2. VWW and the Notion of Truth.- a. The Inner Possibility of Accordance.- b. The Ground of the Possibility of “Richtigkeit” (section 3).- c. The Essence of Dasein’s Opening (Freiheit).- d. The Essence of Truth (section 5).- e. Untruth as Concealment.- f. Untruth as Errancy.- 3. Truth-Untruth according to “Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes”.- B. The Self-Revealing Self-Concealing of Being Itself.- 1. “Die Seinsgeschichtliche Bestimmung des Nihilismus”.- a. The Determination of Nihilism or Metaphysics.- b. The “Remaining Aloof” of Being Itself.- c. “Inauthentic Nihilism”.- 2. The Principle of the Ground and Being’s Self-Sending.- a. The First Formulation.- b. The Second Formulation.- C. Conclusion: A Note on the Time of Being.- II. Being’s Self-Sending, the Danger, and the Saving.- A. Being’s Self-Sending and the Danger (“Die Frage nach der Technik,” pp. 24ff).- B. Being’s Self-Sending and the Saving.- C.The Notion of Essence (Wesen).- III. Technology and Ereignis.- A. Preliminary.- B. Technology and Ereignis according to “Die Kehre”.- C. Technology and Ereignis according to “Der Satz der Identität”.