KNOWLEDGE WORKER ナレッジワーカー



丸善のおすすめ度

【ヴィクトリア朝時代の法律と小説の影響力】

Common Precedents:The Presentness of the Past in Victorian Law and Fiction '13

Ben-Yishai, Ayelet  著

 絶版
   
価格 特価  \28,839(税込)         
発行年月 2013年03月
出版社/提供元
Oxford University Press, New York
出版国 アメリカ合衆国
言語 英語
媒体 冊子
装丁 hardcover
ページ数/巻数 208 p.
ジャンル 洋書/人文科学/文学/イギリス文学
ISBN 9780199937646
商品コード 1011518662
新刊案内掲載月 2013年02月
商品URLhttps://kw.maruzen.co.jp/ims/itemDetail.html?itmCd=1011518662

内容

The mid-Victorian period may be understood as an age of legislative reform during which advocates of positive law sought to replace the diffuse practice of the time, common law, with new, more empirical protocols. Common law, however, survived the challenge. It did this by asserting its present legitimacy via relevant precedents from the past, a logic that in turn provided a powerful, highly desirable strategy to help English maintain their sense of common identity. While precedent originates in law, Ben-Yishai argues, precedential reasoning as a strategy for managing change produced innovations in legal and fictional writing simultaneously and in a mutually constitutive manner, constituting a sophisticated mechanism for negotiating commonality over time. Ben-Yishai, a lawyer and literature professor, looks at "anti-narrativity" in law reports as evidence of legal writers' efforts to negotiate between the new positivist understandings of law and case law's traditional, continuity-seeking approaches. She traces the importance of precedential reasoning in Middlemarch, as both a thematic and didactic element. Anthony Trollope's The Eustace Diamonds is viewed as a narrative reasserting the traditional communitarian power--once enshrined in the jury trial and still evident in gossip and rumor--to define fact, probability, and social norms. And, finally, Ben-Yishai sees Wilkie Collins's The Woman in White as a book that explored the challenge faced by newly empowered classes to represent past precedents to legitimate their otherwise illegitimate status. Rather than offering a conventional interpretation of the cross-fertilization of literature and law, then, the book's argument insists upon a key feature of common law, that longstanding basis of English identity, as permeating both legal and literary narratives of the present by re-narrating the past. Her argument will be of interest to literary critics and historians of the Victorian period, as well as legal and literary scholars working in the field of law and literature.