丸善のおすすめ度
【国際関係における道徳的義務と主権】
Moral Obligations and Sovereignty in International Relations:A Genealogy of Humanitarianism (Global Institutions) '18
|
在庫状況
お取り寄せ
|
お届け予定日
20日間
|
|
|
価格
\34,486(税込)
|
|
|
|
発行年月 |
2018年11月 |
---|
出版社/提供元 |
Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. |
出版国 |
イギリス |
---|
言語 |
英語 |
---|
媒体 |
冊子 |
---|
装丁 |
hardcover |
---|
|
ページ数/巻数 |
xiv, 186 p. |
---|
|
|
ジャンル |
洋書/社会科学/政治学/国際関係論 |
---|
|
|
ISBN |
9781138560178 |
---|
|
商品コード |
1026307249 |
---|
|
|
|
本の性格 |
学術書 |
---|
|
新刊案内掲載月 |
2018年04月 |
---|
|
商品URL | https://kw.maruzen.co.jp/ims/itemDetail.html?itmCd=1026307249 |
---|
内容
This project examines the history of humanitarianism in international relations by tracing the relationship between transnational moral obligation and sovereignty from the 16th century to the present. It answers the question: how has contemporary humanitarianism become the dominant framework for how states construct their moral obligations to non-citizens? Whereas existing studies of humanitarianism examine the diffusion of such norms or their transmission by non-state actors, this book takes a different approach by explicitly linking humanitarianism to the broader concept of sovereignty. Rather than only focusing on the expansion of humanitarian norms, the book examines how sovereignty is both challenged by humanitarian norms at the same time as sets limits on them. In other words, humanitarian norms act just as much to reinforce the logic of sovereignty as they do to challenge it. The book challenges a widely held assumption in international relations scholarship that sovereignty and humanitarian norms are inherently opposed to each other. Contemporary humanitarianism is often described in universalist terms, which suggests that humanitarian activity transcends boundaries in order to provide assistance to those who suffer. In contrast, this book suggests a more counterintuitive and complex understanding of moral obligation, namely that humanitarian discourse not only provides a framework for legitimate humanitarian action, but it also sets the limits of moral obligation. a a a a